CLAIM: Matthew states, “[Judas] went away and hanged himself” (Mt. 27:5). However, Luke writes, “[Judas] burst open in the middle and all his intestines gushed out” (Acts 1:18). New Testament critic Bart Ehrman refers to these passages as “flat out contradictory.”^[1]

RESPONSE: These passages don’t contradict each other; instead, they complement each other. Judas’ body must have been hanging from a tree, and he began to rot. He fell down, and he burst open. Matthew records his initial suicide. Luke records his eventual rotting and decomposition (cf. 2 Sam. 20:10). Why did these two authors choose to emphasize different aspects of Judas’ death?

Matthew was writing to the Jews, who believed that someone was under the judgment of God by hanging from a tree. Deuteronomy states, “He who is hanged is accursed of God” (Deut. 21:23). By contrast, Luke was writing to the Gentiles, who believed that suicide was honorable, so he chose the imagery of a decomposed, unburied body for Judas, which (to a Gentile) would communicate the curse of God. Both accounts were accurately telling the story, but they emphasized different portions of the story to communicate to their respective audiences.

[1] Ehrman, Bart D. Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don’t Know about Them). New York: HarperOne, 2009. 47.